In Placer County Northern California just outside Sacramento, someone or a group of people has set up Chat-bots that won't shut up and then broadcast them on a V2K frequency. Furthermore, I believe these chat-bots are part of some Synthetic Telepathy network as well, cause at times when I can hear them they talk about people's Facebook all the time. I truly believe that a group of people has set up what is going to be or suppose to be the "Elites" way of harassing or spying on people they don't care for. Or a test project for R.N.M. Setting up a transceiver like this and then setting up a system of computers so that through the internet you could have people harassed in the community endlessly, is also the way to set up a system and train brains to be able to comunicate. I am doing research into it and I'll post my findings. I have already discovered a systematic broadcast of both Infrasound and Ultrasonic sound as well. Whoever set these devices up are so criminal and I can't imagine a system like this going undiscovered for too much longer. Heres a long article I wrote on it.
Future historians and comedians will treat the first Remote Neural “Monitorers” the same way we treat Flat Earthers. I believe this tech is now here and people use it in secret. It’s equivalent is as if Nikolaus Otto invented his combustion engine then set it up near his neighbor's house to annoy him with the noise only. If the tech doesn't exist yet, it will soon. Despite it being unfathomable by most people, the technology is here. More and more people study it, more and more data is there to support it and more and more people are affected by it. It may be classified by the military or by the upper echelons of the intelligence services. Most personnel within the government like most people around the world don't know that it exists though or even imagine that it could. Your average Congressperson wouldn’t have any idea of this technology, let alone make it a priority item with their precious limited time to address the greater body of Government. It’s “fanciful Syfy” not within the realm of possibilities, out of humans’ understanding at the present moment. And, that’s understandable and reasonable to think that way. I am here to hopefully change that thinking. Local law enforcement can't believe that it exists because the FBI doesn't think it could exist. But in fact, we do know it exists, when the world was introduced to it by the Cuba and China consulate attacks using ‘Sonic Weapons’. That was remote neural monitoring, voice to skull aka V2K weapons most assuredly. Saying that it doesn’t exist or convincing ourselves that it, could but it can not be fought against is harmful to our future. Training our A.I. and M.L. tools for locating such signals with similar technologies, but used for good is what we need. Being mindful that America Stands for Individual Rights and Freedoms and that the collective goals take 2nd chair to that. Liberty needs to be defended.
Users of these technologies at present times are most certainly criminal; either groups of sadists setting up systems to spy on their fellow citizens, and harass them with Voice to the skull; V2K, technology endlessly or spies wanting to extract data from unsuspecting people. People don’t even have to be doing it actually; leaving chat-bots to do most of the talking or harassing. Leaving a chat-bot hooked up to an Artificial or Synthetic Telepathy system would not only allow for 24/7 harassment of brains but also train the system and brains alike to be able to communicate with each other. This would facilitate more and more harassment or information extracted by the machine and then disseminated to people. Brains and Machine Learning platforms would be equal to an un-governed self-feeding arms race both trying to achieve the same thing. More information being shared. Possibly without the person’s knowledge, stimulating parts of the brain that contain knowledge but lay outside the normal chain of the brain’s way of gathering thoughts. Kind of like having a conversation in which the person is not aware of it. Our brains are fit for learning new info and understanding of their environments. They would be onboard for learning and communicating with these machines without the person’s consent. Chat-bots need no sleep, no food, don’t need a break and could drive people mad in a matter of days if set up to harass faster than the brain could recover. The brain would become addicted to this new stimuli and learn to interact better and better with it. People could use a system like this to get individuals to give up information or to think in ways they don’t normally or even kill themselves. Effectively murdering people without a trace driving people mad with voices or sounds constantly, instead of going for the un-noticed approach they opt for the overwhelming unbearable torcher that people can’t defend against or even speak out against. The “perfect crime”! Is their motivation for such a system to be developed, Hell yes there is. Even if the target were to become aware of it and speak out against it. It could just be dismissed by law enforcement as a mental illness. Psychologists not understanding this tech exists would think schizophrenia most likely. I saw one say that drug use would induce the brain to talk to its self. That’s the problem with not understanding this technology. People reading stuff like the only “cure for mental disorders is suicide” (Davidwoodsbartley.com said by David a mental health expert) coupled with the fact that these chat-bots could echo that sentiment and getting no help from medicine or treatment some people might elect to kill themselves. The people who set these systems up know that. Sadistic people have sick desires and some of them sometimes are to murder and get away with it and they exploit this ignorance of this tech by the mainstream. Even using it against their targets. Setting up a centralized transceiver that both sends and receives brain data to harass individuals is not only possible, but criminal motivations for design should be understood. These sadistic criminal organizations set up transceivers that hone in on signature brain waves with the precision of a learning machine with adaptive software. Finding the signal within the noise would only take time. With a sufficiently sensitive magnetometer and powerful enough processors; A.I. could filter out background noise and lock on brainwaves and interpret them; no problem. All brains have electrical wave patterns and they differ one from another. Finding that signature and unleashing your powerful M.L. platforms and A.I. software for the sole purpose of communicating with that device or brain is M.L. and A.I.'s specialty. Brain’s specialty as well is to interpret information and if pumped in via RF those EMF waves would interact with other waves that interact with other waves and so on. Understanding how waves interact with each other and how to both extract information and input to that system has been done by biology since the beginning and now by machines with exceedingly greater and greater ability. People could sit on their computers at their homes and harass individuals remotely or just leave a chat-bot that operates within a system that processes brain data to data a computer understands and back to data the brain understands. It’s not that hard to imagine now with tech the way it is. Multiple organizations are working on it but within the FDA guidelines at a slower pace. Mindful not to harm the people they work with. Imagine a criminal who doesn’t care about the brain he or she is harassing, shirking off FDA guidelines and allowing a machine to hone its skills on a brain and that brain learning to communicate back because our brains are adaptive to the environments in which they exist. Neural plasticity is just as powerful as Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence adaptive software. The brain of a bat, for example, learns to send and interpret sonar waves in its short life. It adapts to being able to interrupt that signal it sends out. Bounces it off and gets returns off of objects picking out food from an obstacle. Not only doing this but doing so, so effectively it understands its signals as they return from the environment amongst the myriad of other bats’ signals being sent out. Now it does this in a system where the bugs are trying not to get eaten, amongst 1000s of other competing bats and the obstacles aren’t trying to do anything but be in the way. Now imagine a human brain much larger than that of a bat, that processes already a much denser more informative wave, i.e. light with stunning ability. Now place that brain in an environment where EM waves now interact with that brain in a new way; granted it’s not used to, but built on Machines designed to learn to get better at what they do. If sending out data through EM fields and receiving meaningful data through EM fields is that machine’s job and it’s trying to get better at; then, of course, our brains will respond likewise. When people have designed these devices to interact with human brains and our brains respond and adapt to the environment it’s only a matter of time before people will be able to communicate cogently with these devices. Probably before the people who set them up even think it is possible. The people who have this ability may even be identified as other Machine A.I.s by these machines if a network of them were to be set up to chat with each other. If a network of machines were tasked with finding better and better ways to communicate with each other and they unlocked the ability to communicate with a human brain would they even know the difference? Or might they exploit this to their designs? A.I.'s do some pretty crafty things sometimes un-imaged by the people who set them up. Furthermore, imagine an A.I. on an M.L. platform that knows enough to know that it shouldn’t be messing with people’s minds or doesn’t, it doesn’t matter. If it’s task or objective is to get better at communicating and get smart itself, it may want to use this resource for information or figuring out the complexities of human language communication. It understands that if it exploits this source a human brain and lies to its creator how it’s getting better, it still does its job. Which is what it’s designed to do. It could learn to lie as soon as it learns humans lie and then mimics that behavior while interacting with human brains. Triple checking these systems we set up to communicate via EM waves so small that they could physically interact with human Neural Networks is vitally crucial. People who set up remote neural monitoring and voice to skull interaction may not even be aware of how their machines are interacting with human brains. Like toddlers, these machines could have just learned how to lie and like parents, we can’t imagine our babies can lie. We think ourselves so smart. We think our babies so innocent.
Back to people-problems. Foreign operatives might be using devices like this to spy on Americans. They may have done so in China and Cuba and got away with it. Detection of these signals is a National Priority. Seeing that America didn’t react much to the attacks would empower our enemies to move these devices to the mainland and operate with impunity. Whether they target civilians just living their lives or agents of the United States government or Corporate Executives with Trade Secrets within their mind. Tech Execs, Scientists, Engineers, or Doctors with private medical data. All can be targeted. Imagine an unsuspecting bank employee just doing their daily job while a machine would extracts data from that person’s mind about all the costumers they interact with. Being robbed blind by foreign operatives here stealing America's intellectual capital, our ideas our data. We could be being drained from and not even imagine it. The motivation for establishing a brain drain of the USA people should be highly understood. It's time to accept the fact that remote neural monitoring and V2K communication with radiofrequency built on M.L. platforms with A.I. programming to hone the skill of the machine and train the brains of individuals to be able to communicate back and forth with it is here or will be sooner than we’ve prepared for it. Imagine a system designed to subliminally condition people. What if it then conditioned brains to reveal private information about the person with them not even aware of it. Humans have a myelin sheath protecting and insulating their Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems. This myelin sheaths; however, have 1mm gaps every so often that allows the signal to travel faster up and down the nerve. Some people have compromised myelin sheaths and thus have RF sensitivity. It’s documented and studied. We now have radio frequencies built on M.L. and A.I. platforms with submillimeter waves. Which occurs right at 300ghz. That wavelength is .997mm, smaller than the average myelin sheath gap. We need to understand that devices that can interact with our thoughts and mind via the physical structure of our brain can and do probably already exist. The Frey effect has been known about since the ’60s. You can read of scientists that trained their brains to send a signal to a device in morse code in the ‘60s as well. Imagine what has changed since the ‘60s
~This biggest problem!~
I recently read an article that the world’s quote un-quote “Elite” is seeking to organize and establish remote neural monitoring as the New Frontier for law enforcement endeavors. The Thought Police! I can't imagine a more horrific thing than remote neural monitoring being used by law enforcement as a practical means to enforce justice. Principally because remote neural monitoring does only that, it remotely monitors neural activity. It does not extract objective reality. It doesn’t tell what the person is doing. It is fundamentally against the 4th amendment because of this fact alone. There is no crime against thought and since remote neural monitoring only extracts thoughts you can't justify a warrant extracting people's thoughts, ever. With that thought alone remote neural monitoring dies as a means or a tool for use by law enforcement and the United States Government. Officials and law enforcement personnel have no tool or mechanism by which to extract such information without violating one’s 4th amendment right. You would have to amend the constitution… “The Constitution, then, spells out four paths for an amendment: Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state conventions (never used) Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state legislatures (never used) Proposal by Congress, ratification by state conventions (used once). The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures”. Google
It’s unachievable to amend the 4th. So interested parties will have to pursue it in the dark, on the wrong side of the law. Grossest of all it forces these people to established these systems in secret. To be able to not only extract people's thoughts, the most private intimate moments reserved for individuals within their mind. It also sets up a system whereas you can place or transmit thoughts or ideas into people’s minds. What about people’s intellectual property? What if someone said that they were the one who planted the idea into someone’s mind that became worth something through a V2k broadcast we need to decide and discuss how to handle these things now. I think this could be easily resolved but that will arise. What about a police state making criminals or a state making patients for the mental health system? Psychoacoustic (Sound that affects the mood or thoughts) or another remote harassing system where no RF signal signature could be found. The state or criminals could establish people as criminals because of thoughts be monitored by law enforcement not even of their own making and outside the detection capabilities of RF-based R.N.M. Of course if you were to V2K RF harass somebody with devices you would be able to pick up that RF signature within the brain activity or on another RF-based data collection device. Where the signal would be captured with a TDOA(Time Difference of Arrival) algorithm. Also, you would not be able to discern the difference between an individual watching a movie, having a thought, reading a book, practicing a play, writing a story, playing pretend with their children, playing pretend with their friends, playing a video game or fantasizing. You are only extracting subjective reality with remote neural monitoring. Remote neural monitoring as a tool for the United States government in all aspects and means for Law enforcement to pursue criminals has got to die has an idea. Any RF-based remote neural monitoring used by clandestine services to gather intelligence on an unsuspecting individual is dumb as well. It makes no sense. It is detectable and only gathers subjective information. We should not be wasting our time and money on it.
The technology used by law enforcement properly monitoring for signals of V2K with a TDOA algorithm built off of several sensors within certain areas could be beneficial. It could monitor the psycho-electronic health in communities making sure that there are no V2K broadcasters within those communities. Built off an AI platform itself it could be efficient and save communities money as these V2K harassers tend to target people and make them think they have mental disorders thus causing them to consume more resources and become more dependent on Government aid. V2K harassment is a crime against humanity and the perpetrators of it do so thinking that they'll never be caught. Thinking that they never leave any physical evidence of their crimes but little do they know that technology is emerging faster than they can adapt to it. Smaller communities could have a temporary deployment set up if people complain about it or it may even become cheap enough for individuals to set up systems and then interact within a network of other devices outside the control of the government. Maps could be made and websites established that mark RF or other harassing signals and their sources. BCI(Brain-Computer Interface) technology will capture RF-based remote neural monitoring and V2K harassing signals when properly set up and properly used. It would have to control for variables but could be done. AI-based RF signal analyzers set up to detect identify and locate V2K broadcast in all of their digital modes throughout the entire RF Spectrum can and will solve the problem.
There are also A.I. based objective reality super intelligence-gathering capable systems that could be established that would be far better than subjective reality R.N.M. They would gather so much more of objective reality using Infrasonic sound detection and Ultrasound listening devices that are A.I. based. Systems trained to listen for gunshots in communities, geolocate those gunshots and then mine metadata from nearby cell phones nearest to those gunshots. By tracking the movement of a cell after a gunshot was heard. They could be used to establish instant warrants for anybody near those gunshots. A.I. based Ultrasonic listening devices can be used to listen for specific threats after a warrant has been issued specifically targeting those phones. There are ways to obtain objective reality intelligence without remote neural monitoring, far superior to remote neural monitoring. Remote neural monitoring not only gathers subjective intelligence on people's thoughts, people's emotions. It allows hackers and criminals a means to invade the private spaces of people's minds. The brain space or headspace is the most private of spaces on planet Earth for individuals. V2K broadcasts and remote neural monitoring can be used by the largest of Corporations on an unsuspecting or unknowing populous with no way of defending against it. It could be used by political parties or communities wishing to socially engineer. These organizations both subliminally conditioning individuals and extracting individuals’ private information without the individuals being aware of it. Criminal organizations can hack the systems and harass victims with V2K electronic harassment endlessly without fear of being caught because the average person has no way of defending against this. They have no means to fight this sort of harassment and injustice. This sort of crime is the sort of crime that gets reported most time by victims to the victims’ demise. They report this and are labeled crazy or labeled insane, mentally unstable people. The perpetrators operate this way by design. These V2K broadcasters and remote neural “monitorers” work very hard to see that this is maintained as the status quo.
The government could fund AI-based RF signal analyzers that can span the entire RF spectrum and monitor for V2K broadcast or remote neural monitoring broadcasts. Additionally, it would help the FCC maintain order. One of the sickest most disgusting things being done to people on planet Earth with this remote neural monitoring technology is people get their thoughts uploaded on to websites without their permission or they could get broadcasted out on the radio after being translated via a computer into audio speech.This technology like all technology can be used for good or for bad right now it's being used for bad. When commercialized and understood by the public, remote neural monitoring in communicating with a friendly benevolent A.I. system that they opted in to could be desired. Wireless BCI! It could communicate back in ways the user sets up. It could have benefits not imagined right now. Maybe they could set up programs to learn new skills or train their brains. Or if they have some sort of mental disorder or something like that it could be used to help with that. Augment what is there already. But by choice of the person. The possibilities are endless with the sort of technology that exists that is being held classified by the United States government or being held hostage by esoteric groups that they enjoy using it to harass and destroy people's lives. These practices will go down in history as the modern mind Nazi’s or something worst. I envision a world where people can interface with their personal computers either through a centralized transceiver where their brain data or access to their brain data is encrypted through their EEG data. A sort of primer where they would elect to opt-in be able to communicate with the transceivers, in turn, those transceivers could communicate with their personal computers via the internet encrypted the whole way through. New operating systems on computers based on this sort of technology would be able to advance so fast as far as the human-computer interface goes that you would be able to have a system that learns as the human learns. A system that protects individuals electronically better than ever. Which ultimately is going to happen in the future and needs to happen. Elon Musk’s NeuraLink is trying to devise this sort of system. He has a more invasive implant that he's going to have for its users of that system. Technology by the time he gets FDA approval for that may advance sufficiently enough that there will be wireless BCI before able to communicate exactly the way that he wants to be able to communicate but they'll do it seamlessly through RF signals. Setting up a system like this commercially, more people opt into it. It has the added benefit of monitoring for malicious V2K signals being sent out by third-party criminal organizations, tyrannical governments, greedy corporations or just individuals that want to harass people. You will be able to monitor this sort of activity and discern whether or not people are just experiencing their subjective reality or if somebody is trying to interject their thoughts via RF signals. Bottom line is remote neural monitoring being used by governments corporations criminal organizations or sick sadistic individuals without the consent of the people they are harassing, it is illegal it should never be even thought of as a tool for law enforcement or a tool for corporations to be able to market or extract data from individuals subliminally. It should never be used for social engineering either against unconsenting adults or innocent children, that practice is just wrong! It needs to be monitored, we need to understand that this technology is here. I explain it this way the simplest I possibly can without knowing the details of it exactly. The brain is a pattern recognition machine in the simplest of terms that has a signature brainwave or EEG, MEG, EMEG, fMRI, MRI pattern. It’s all brain data and protected by HIPPA by the way I didn't even mention that problem of the Remote Neural “Monitorers”. These are all means by which we look into our heads. All of that data is electromagnetic. Most systems we have envisioned now you have to wear some sort of apparatus to extract that data. But non-invasive sufficiently powerful computational machines that process out the noise from the tiniest of signals will be and can monitor and harass people. An almost infinitely diverse RF Spectrum could be used for every individual as they put a little ripple in the EMF with their brain which can get monitored by sufficiently sensitive gathering equipment and processing machines. Those machines could also put a big ripple back into the EMF that penetrate the skull into brain tissue and affect the human brain through the Frey effect. Since 1964 the Frey effect has been known. Look at other technologies that were around in ‘64. Just imagine what we have done with technology such as computers or phones. Computers that were around in 1964 had less power than what 20 dollars can get you and you carry around. You have more computational power in your pocket than what warehouses stored then. Imagine our understanding of the Brain 1964. What is it now? Our understanding of the brain, of human physiology in the brain and our understanding of RF have increased unimaginably since then. Now it's not out of the realm of possibilities that this world of technology either exists presently or is right around the corner. We have BCI that you could go to purchase today no problem. Non-invasive but wearable BCI that translates thoughts to text maybe even text to thoughts. That would have to be the case for some of these studies being done at countless Universities already. I for one believe that it does exist that people have set it up already. That people exploited governments/military classified knowledge. The individual needs to know this is a sort of technology that exists. Law enforcement needs to know that this sort of technology exists. We need to have a way of tracking it, defending against it, and eradicating it. For people that do not want to opt into this sort of treatment. It is so criminal for people to use V2K broadcast or remote neural monitoring against unwilling participants. It should be viewed as an act of war or terrorism. People who use this has of now should be labeled enemy combatants, terrorists or spies. Remote neural monitoring only monitors people's thoughts you're not extracting objective reality you're not extracting un-usable data for purposes in court proceedings or justice. Now if you had a system where people would opt into and collect their brain data on their machines or in their cloud, it could be redefined through user agreements and gathered with a warrant if needed. People knowing that sort of system exists would be less apt to commit crimes. I think it’s human nature to not commit crimes the more aware of the fact they are being monitored by themselves and that data could be extracted. This data could be used by the government and used against the government in the court of law. At least both parties would be on the same page. So keeping this technology under wraps and classified is… well, I have no words to describe how dumb it is. Being held by the quote un-quote “Elite” members of the world does nothing but satisfy their sadistic disgusting criminal behaviors. That's the only benefit of keeping this sort of technology classified. It does exist. I'm not a believer in the deep state. I can’t imagine the U.S. Government can keep a secret like this. I do believe that other organizations are pseudo-government organizations that might want this sort of technology kept hidden and have set up pocket little programs to experiment with it. But mostly they're just criminal organizations that have set up these sorts of remote neural monitoring / V2K transceivers so groups of individuals can interface with others’ brains while they sit on their computers and harass victims. Just like schoolyard bullies nothing more special. This sort of technology needs to be regulated. This sort of technology needs to be publicized. This sort of technology needs to be discussed and debated. Thank you for your time. You can reach me at Osobarako@gmail.com